Market Research
Understanding your market size, competition, and positioning before you build.
Why Market Research Matters
Problem validation tells you the problem is real. Market research tells you whether the surrounding economics work:
- Is the market big enough?
- Who else is solving this?
- What are they doing wrong?
- How will you differentiate?
- Can you actually win?
The trap: assuming "no competition" is good. Usually it means no market.
The reality: competition validates demand. Your job is to find a wedge.
Market Size Analysis
TAM, SAM, SOM
TAM (Total Addressable Market):
- Everyone who could theoretically use your product
- Usually billions
- Mostly irrelevant
SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market):
- People you can actually reach with your business model
- More realistic
- Still optimistic
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market):
- What you can realistically capture in 3 years
- This is what matters
- Be brutally honest
Example: Project Management Software
TAM: all businesses that need project management = $10B.
- Every company needs PM
- Global market
- Sounds impressive to investors
SAM: small remote software teams in US = $500M.
- Your actual target customer
- Limited by your go-to-market
- More realistic
SOM: 1,000 customers at $1,000/year = $1M.
- What you can realistically get
- Given your resources
- In first 3 years
The rule: focus on SOM, not TAM. Can you build a $1M+ business with realistic customer acquisition?
Bottom-Up Market Sizing
Formula: SOM = (# Target Customers) × (Conversion Rate) × (Price) × (Retention)
Example:
- Target customers: 50,000 small software teams
- Conversion rate: 2% (realistic for B2B SaaS)
- Price: $100/month ($1,200/year)
- Retention: 80% annual
Year 1: 50,000 x 2% x $1,200 x 100% = $1.2M
Year 2: add 1,000 + retain 800 = 1,800 x $1,200 = $2.16M
Year 3: add 1,000 + retain 1,440 = 2,440 x $1,200 = $2.93M
Is that enough? Depends on your goals and costs.
Market Sizing Questions
| Question | Good Answer | Bad Answer |
|---|---|---|
| How many target customers exist? | 50,000-500,000 | 50 million |
| Can you reach them? | Yes, through X channel | "If we go viral" |
| What is realistic conversion? | 1-5% | 20%+ |
| What will customer acquisition cost? | $500-2,000 | "No idea" |
| How much will they pay? | Based on interviews | "Whatever" |
| What is the growth rate? | 10-30% annually | 200%+ |
Competitive Analysis
Finding Your Competition
Do not just Google competitors. Look for:
- Direct competitors (same solution)
- Indirect competitors (different solution, same problem)
- Substitute behaviours (how people solve it today)
Example: meal planning app
- Direct: other meal planning apps
- Indirect: recipe websites, food blogs
- Substitutes: Pinterest, cookbooks, winging it
Where to research:
- Google "[problem] solution"
- Product Hunt
- G2 / Capterra reviews
- Reddit recommendations
- LinkedIn groups
- Industry reports
- VC portfolio pages
Competitive Analysis Framework
| Competitor | Positioning | Strengths | Weaknesses | Price | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitor A | Enterprise | Features, integrations | Expensive, complex | $500/mo | 4.2/5 |
| Competitor B | SMB | Affordable, simple | Limited features | $50/mo | 3.8/5 |
| Competitor C | Freelancers | Free, easy | No support, buggy | $0 | 3.5/5 |
Analyse:
- What do customers love? Read 5-star reviews.
- What do customers hate? Read 1-star reviews.
- What is missing? Feature requests.
- What is the price range?
- Who serves what segment?
The Jobs-to-Be-Done Competitive Map
People do not buy products. They "hire" them to do a job.
Example: getting to work
- Cars
- Public transit
- Bikes
- Uber / Lyft
- Walking
- Scooters
- Remote work
These are all "competitors" for the job of commuting.
For your idea:
- Define the job clearly
- List all ways people currently do this job
- Understand why they choose each option
- Find the underserved segment
Competitive Positioning Map
Plot competitors on two axes.
Example axes:
- Price (low to high)
- Features (simple to complex)
- Target customer (SMB to Enterprise)
- Technical skill required (beginner to expert)
Find the gap:
- Where are no competitors?
- Why is that space empty?
- Is it a real opportunity or a trap?
Common gaps:
- High price + simple features (might not exist = not viable)
- Low price + complex features (might be hard to sustain)
- Medium price + perfect features (the sweet spot)
Differentiation Strategy
Why "Better" Is Not Enough
Bad: "We're like X but better."
- Customers already use X
- Switching costs are high
- "Better" is subjective
- Incumbents will copy you
Good: "We're for Y who need Z."
- Clear target customer
- Specific use case
- Meaningful difference
- Defensible position
The 10x Rule
To get customers to switch, you need to be 10x better on at least one dimension.
10x better could mean:
- 10x cheaper
- 10x faster
- 10x simpler
- 10x more powerful (for a specific use case)
- 10x better experience
Examples:
- Dropbox vs FTP: 10x simpler
- Slack vs email: 10x better for team chat
- Zoom vs Skype: 10x more reliable
- Notion vs Word: 10x more flexible
Ask yourself: what is your 10x?
Differentiation Dimensions
| Dimension | Example |
|---|---|
| Price | 1/10th the cost of competitors |
| Speed | Results in seconds vs hours |
| Simplicity | No setup vs weeks of implementation |
| Targeting | Built for X vs generic tool |
| Experience | Delightful vs functional |
| Integration | Works with Y vs standalone |
| Business model | Self-serve vs enterprise sales |
Pick 1-2 dimensions to dominate. You cannot be best at everything.
The Positioning Statement
Template:
For [target customer] who [customer need], [product name] is a
[product category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [competition],
[product name] [primary differentiation].
Examples:
Slack:
For teams who need to communicate, Slack is a messaging platform
that centralises all conversations. Unlike email, Slack organises
communication by channel and integrates with your tools.
Superhuman:
For busy professionals who need to manage email efficiently,
Superhuman is an email client that helps you get through inbox
twice as fast. Unlike Gmail, Superhuman is keyboard-first and
optimised for speed.
Your turn: write your positioning statement.
Customer Segmentation
Why Segment?
You cannot serve everyone. You need to focus.
Segments differ by:
- Problem intensity
- Willingness to pay
- Reachability
- Competition
- Size
Start with one segment, dominate it, then expand.
B2B Segmentation
| Criteria | Startup | SMB | Mid-Market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company size | 1-10 | 10-200 | 200-1,000 | 1,000+ |
| Budget | $100-1,000/yr | $1,000-10,000/yr | $10,000-100,000/yr | $100,000+/yr |
| Decision time | Days | Weeks | Months | 6-12 months |
| Features needed | Basic | Standard | Advanced | Custom |
| Support expected | Self-serve | Phone + Email | Dedicated rep | |
| Sales motion | Product-led | Inside sales | Field sales | Enterprise sales |
Pick one. Do not try to serve all.
B2C Segmentation
Demographic:
- Age, income, location, education
- Useful but not sufficient
Psychographic:
- Values, attitudes, interests, lifestyle
- More predictive of behaviour
Behavioural:
- Usage patterns, brand loyalty, benefits sought
- Most actionable
Example: fitness app
- Segment 1: busy professionals who want quick workouts
- Segment 2: enthusiasts who want detailed tracking
- Segment 3: beginners who need guidance
Different segments mean different products.
Choosing Your Segment
Evaluate each segment:
| Criteria | Weight | Score (1-10) |
|---|---|---|
| Problem intensity | 3x | |
| Segment size | 2x | |
| Willingness to pay | 3x | |
| Reachability | 2x | |
| Competition | 1x | |
| Your advantage | 2x |
Pick the highest-scoring segment.
Market Trends
Growth vs Decline
Growing markets:
- Rising tide lifts all boats
- Easier to acquire customers
- More funding available
- Competition is good
Declining markets:
- Fighting for shrinking pie
- Hard to grow
- Less investment
- Avoid unless you are disrupting
How to assess:
- Google Trends (search volume)
- Industry reports (Gartner, Forrester)
- VC funding data (Crunchbase)
- Job postings (LinkedIn)
- Conference attendance
- Community size growth
Technology Shifts
Platform shifts create opportunities:
- Mobile (2007-2015): all desktop apps rebuilt for mobile
- Cloud (2010-2020): all installed software moved to SaaS
- AI (2023+): all products getting AI features
The pattern: when a new platform emerges, existing solutions need to be rebuilt.
Current shifts (as of 2026):
- AI / ML going mainstream
- No-code / low-code
- Remote / async work
- Privacy-first tools
- Web3 / blockchain (maybe)
Ask: does your idea ride a wave or fight a tide?
Regulatory Changes
New regulations create new opportunities:
- GDPR: privacy tools
- SOX: compliance software
- Cannabis legalisation: dispensary tech
- Gig worker classification: HR tools
Research:
- Pending legislation
- Industry compliance requirements
- International expansion needs
Competitive Advantage
Types of Moats
What makes you defensible?
Network effects
- Product gets better with more users
- Examples: Slack, Uber, marketplace platforms
- Hardest to build, strongest moat
Switching costs
- Painful to leave once adopted
- Examples: CRMs, ERPs, workflow tools
- Strong for B2B
Brand
- Trusted name in the space
- Examples: Apple, Nike
- Takes years to build
Economies of scale
- Unit costs decrease with volume
- Examples: AWS, manufacturing
- Needs capital
Data and learning
- Product improves from usage data
- Examples: recommendation engines, AI
- Compounds over time
Regulatory
- License or compliance barriers
- Examples: healthcare, finance
- Limited applicability
Early stage: focus on #2 (switching costs) and #5 (data).
Building Your Moat
Year 1: customer lock-in.
- Make product sticky
- High switching costs
- Deep integration
Year 2-3: network effects.
- Add multiplayer features
- User-generated content
- Community building
Year 4+: scale and brand.
- Lower unit costs
- Market leadership
- Brand recognition
Do not worry about moats until you have product-market fit.
Pricing Research
What Can You Charge?
Methods:
- Ask in interviews: "What would this be worth to you?"
- Look at competitors: what is the range?
- Calculate value: how much do you save them?
- Test willingness to pay: landing page with prices
General rules:
- B2B: $100-10,000+/month
- Prosumer: $10-100/month
- Consumer: $5-20/month or free + ads
Value-based pricing:
- If you save $10,000, charge $2,000 (20%)
- If you generate $100,000, charge $10,000 (10%)
- If you save 10 hours/week, charge $500/month
Pricing Strategies
Good:
- Multiple tiers (good, better, best)
- Annual discount (improves cash flow and retention)
- Free trial (low friction)
- Starts low, grows with usage
Bad:
- Too cheap (signals low value)
- Too many tiers (confusing)
- Features gated by arbitrary limits
- Pricing tied to vanity metrics
Example: B2B SaaS
Starter: $49/month (small teams)
Professional: $199/month (growing teams)
Enterprise: custom (large orgs)
Market Research Checklist
[ ] Calculated realistic SOM (not just TAM)
[ ] Identified all direct competitors
[ ] Identified indirect competitors and substitutes
[ ] Read 50+ reviews of competitors (5-star and 1-star)
[ ] Created competitive positioning map
[ ] Identified underserved segment
[ ] Defined 10x differentiation
[ ] Wrote positioning statement
[ ] Assessed market trend (growing or declining)
[ ] Researched pricing of competitors
[ ] Calculated value-based price
[ ] Chose target segment to focus on
[ ] Identified potential moat
[ ] Confirmed market is large enough
[ ] Confirmed you can reach customers
Red Flags
Stop if:
Market is too small.
- Less than 10,000 potential customers
- Cannot reach $1M revenue realistically
- Niche within a niche
Market is declining.
- Google Trends showing downward trend
- Industry reports pessimistic
- Funding drying up
Competition is too strong.
- Incumbents have strong moats
- Recent well-funded entrants
- No clear differentiation possible
Cannot reach customers affordably.
- CAC > LTV
- No clear acquisition channel
- Customer buying process too long
Price point does not work.
- Cannot charge enough to be viable
- Value delivered is too low
- Customers have no budget
Moving to Solution Validation
You now know:
- Market is large enough
- Competition exists but has gaps
- Your differentiation strategy
- Target segment to focus on
- Realistic pricing
- How to position yourself
Next up: testing whether YOUR solution actually solves the problem.
Resources
Market research tools:
- Google Trends (search interest)
- SimilarWeb (traffic estimates)
- BuiltWith (technology stacks)
- Crunchbase (funding data)
- G2 / Capterra (reviews)
Competitive intelligence:
- Owler (company info)
- Product Hunt (new launches)
- AngelList (startup data)
- Reddit / forums (user sentiment)
Industry reports:
- Gartner, Forrester (enterprise)
- CB Insights (venture / startups)
- Statista (statistics)
- Trade associations
Next Steps
Continue to 04-solution-validation.md to test whether your specific solution actually solves the validated problem.